lm-double-shapeSausser Summers, PC

Providing CA trademark services throughout the CA and across the globe.
  • Lower Cost
  • Faster Process
  • Experienced Trademark Attorneys

File a Trademark for $399 + $250 Government Filing Fee

Trademark Attorney Working With Clients in Hamilton, Ontario

If you're an entrepreneur, you know that protecting your intellectual property should be high on your list when it comes to safeguarding your company. However, as a successful business owner, you also know the steps and costs of filing a trademark in the CA can be expensive and arduous.

This conundrum can be even more overwhelming for new business owners who want to do everything possible to minimize the price of securing trademarks. They try to handle complicated tasks like trademark registration on their own, which can be a big mistake - especially when juggling the day-to-day tasks of running a business. You may be thinking, "But what about those set-it-and-forget-it services you can find online? All you have to do is plug in your info, and you're done." Using pre-made templates for trademark filing can be tempting, but doing so can leave you with inadequate protection and hurt you in the long run.

So, what is the easiest, most cost-effective route to consider that also minimizes legal risk? The truth is, before you spend money on an online filing service, it's best to consult with a trademark attorney working with clients in Hamilton, Ontario.

At Sausser Summers, PC, our experienced trademark attorneys can help you understand the trademark process step by step. We can even help with CA trademark filing, CA trademark responses, and CA trademark renewals at a price you can actually afford. That way, you can make an informed decision regarding your business without having to break the bank.

Sausser Summers, PC: Simplifying the CA Trademark Process

Hiring an attorney can be a daunting task, but at Sausser Summers, PC, our goal is to make the process as simple and seamless as possible for you. That's why we offer a straightforward checkout service. First, you choose your flat fee trademark service and fill out a short questionnaire. Then, we will contact you within 24 hours to discuss the details of our service. From there, one of our experienced trademark attorneys will get to work on your behalf.

Using a trademark attorney for filing in Hamilton, Ontario, can significantly increase your chances of a successful registration. The CA government recommends hiring a trademark attorney to help with your application, and our team of trademark lawyers is dedicated to meeting your needs. In fact, we help ensure your application is filed correctly the first time so you can get on with your life and avoid legal risks.

At Sausser Summers, PC, we work closely with our clients to understand their needs and provide them with sound professional advice. We never offer incomplete services, such as simply filing for registration, because that would leave you open to legal risks. You can rely on us to handle your intellectual property matters, and our flat fee services can help protect your business in a simple, straightforward, and affordable way. It's really that simple.

In terms of filing a CA trademark, we provide an easy three-step process to protect your intellectual property:

1. You provide your trademark info to our team via an online form.

2. Our team performs a comprehensive trademark search. This search ensures that no other marks will prevent you from registering your trademark in the CA Once performed, we'll send you a legal opinion letter that details our findings.

3. Sausser Summers, PC, files your CA trademark application. We are then listed as your Attorney of Record on file. From there, we'll provide ongoing updates regarding the status of your trademark as it works through the registration process.

The bottom line? At Sausser Summers, PC, we give both new and seasoned business owners an easy, efficient, cost-effective way to protect the one asset that sets them apart from others: their name.

Online Trademark Attorney Hamilton, Ontario
The bottom line?

At Sausser Summers, PC, we give both new and seasoned business owners an easy, efficient, cost-effective way to protect the one asset that sets them apart from others: their name.

Do I Really Need a Trademark Attorney for Protecting My Business in Hamilton, Ontario?

It's not necessary to be a lawyer in order to apply for a trademark. Anyone can submit a trademark application to the CA Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). However, registering a trademark involves more than just filling out a form. It's essential to conduct thorough research, accurately identify and clearly explain your trademark to ensure it receives adequate protection. And even after securing a trademark, you've got to monitor it consistently to make sure it's free from infringement.

The big takeaway here is that it's always a good idea to work with a trademark attorney to protect the intellectual property that you've worked so hard to establish. According to the Wall Street Journal, applicants are approximately 50% more likely to secure their trademark than people who file applications on their own. If your trademark application is rejected by the USPTO, you will need to revise and refile it, incurring additional filing fees. To avoid delays and extra costs, it is best to have a trademark lawyer help you get it right the first time.

Additional Benefits of Using a Trademark Attorney

Great trademark attorneys (like those you'll find at Sausser Summers, PC) will help with every step of filing and enforcing your trademark. Some additional benefits include the following:

Check to see if your proposed trademark is registered by another entity.

Conduct research to see if another business is using the trademark for which you're applying.

Provide advice and guidance on the strength of your trademark.

Draft and submit your trademark applications and application revisions.

Advice and guidance regarding trademark maintenance and protection.

Monitor the market for unauthorized use of your trademark.

Trademark enforcement to protect you against infringement.

Online Trademark Lawyer Hamilton, Ontario

Curious whether our trademark attorney services are right for you and your business? Contact Sausser Summer, PC, today. Let's talk about what you need, and how we can help.

What About Online Filing Services?

Online services, can provide you with basic assistance in filing your trademark. However, they will never be a legitimate substitute for an experienced trademark attorney helping clients in Hamilton, Ontario.

Trademark Attorney Hamilton, Ontario

Although online filing services offer a step-by-step process, they take a one-size-fits-all approach to preparing legal documents. Even their advanced service only provides basic attorney assistance in completing your paperwork and helping with minor roadblocks. Online filing services' disclaimer highlights the many limitations of its services, including the fact that communications are not protected by attorney-client privilege. In addition, online filing services cannot provide advice, explanations, opinions, recommendations, or any kind of legal guidance on possible legal rights, remedies, defenses, options, selection of forms or strategies.

In other words, online filing services can offer you the necessary forms and point you in the right direction, but they cannot customize their services to your specific needs or help you with serious complications that may arise.

For the most comprehensive trademark service and protection, it's always wise to work with highly rated trademark lawyers, like you'll find at Sausser Summers, PC.

Understanding Trademarks Over Time

Trademarks in the CA can last indefinitely, but did you know that clients in Hamilton, Ontario can file a trademark online, only to lose protection in some circumstances? Trademarks differ from patents and copyrights in that they do not have an expiration date. However, to prevent the cancellation of a trademark, you must maintain it. To ensure that your trademark remains protected, you must actively use it in commerce and renew it with the USPTO every ten years.

The Lanham Act tells us that "use in commerce" is the legitimate use of a trademark in the ordinary course of trade. In other words, you cannot register a trademark solely to reserve the rights to it in the future. In most cases, a trademark must be used continuously in connection with the goods or services it is registered for.

Trademark Law Firm Hamilton, Ontario

Steps to Renew Your Trademark

Trademarks are registered with the USPTO and generally need to be renewed every ten years. However, there is one crucial exception that you should be aware of. Within the first ten years of owning a trademark, you must file for renewal between the fifth and sixth year from the date of your initial registration.

During this renewal period, you are required to submit a Section 8 declaration, a specimen that shows how the mark is being used, and pay the required fee. You can also apply for Section 15 Incontestability status, which can strengthen your trademark rights. This application, although not mandatory, can make it harder for others to challenge your ownership of the mark.

After the first renewal, which falls between the fifth and sixth year of ownership, the next renewal filing is due between the ninth and tenth year, and then every tenth year thereafter. In the ninth year you will need to file a Section 8 declaration, attesting to your use of the mark or excusable nonuse. You've also got to file a Section 9 renewal application before the end of the tenth year to keep your registration active.

It is worth noting that the USPTO provides a six-month grace period if you fail to renew your mark within the required time frame, but it is best not to rely on it. If you don't file within the grace period time limits, the USPTO will cancel and expire your mark.

By hiring trademark attorneys helping clients in Hamilton, Ontario, you can avoid the pitfalls and mistakes that can arise and cause you to lose your rights to the mark that represents it.

Losing Your Trademark Rights Through Abandonment

In the event that you stop using your trademark and have no plans to resume using it in commerce, it may be considered abandoned by the USPTO. This could result in the loss of your protective rights to the mark. Typically, a trademark is assumed to be abandoned if it has not been used for three years. However, you may be able to refute this presumption by providing evidence that you intend to use the mark again in the future.

Losing Your Trademark Rights Through Inappropriate Licensing

In addition to trademark abandonment, you should also be wary of improper licensing. It's important to remember that once you allow someone else to use your trademark, you must keep an eye on how they use it. You should monitor the products or services that feature your trademark to ensure that they meet consumers' expectations in terms of quality. Failure to do so can lead to a "naked" trademark license and the loss of your protective trademark rights.

How to Avoid Having to Refile Your Trademark

If you're wondering how you can avoid refiling your trademark, the answer is simple: file it correctly the first time around. Filing a trademark isn't inherently difficult, but when doing so, it's very important that certain aspects are filled out accurately in your application. If any information is missing or incorrect, the trademark application may be considered "void ab initio" or void from the beginning, requiring you to file again.

To avoid this, make sure that the information you provide in the application is accurate and complete, including the ownership of the trademark. For instance, if a corporation has multiple shareholders, it should not file under the President's personal name. The rightful owner should be the one/entity that ultimately controls the trademark and the associated goods/services.

It is also important to ensure that the goods and/or services description is precise. For example, if you sell electronic products, you should not file for research and development services despite having a research and development department. The goods/services description should reflect the goods/services you offer to customers, not the departments within your business.

Additionally, providing accurate dates of first use when filing for a trademark is crucial. The USPTO requires two dates to be specified - the date of first use anywhere and the date of first use in interstate commerce. Contact our trademark law office today to learn more about having accurate dates on your filing paperwork.

Trademark Lawyer Hamilton, Ontario
Trademark Firm Hamilton, Ontario

What Makes an Online Trademark Attorney Great?

At Sausser Summers, PC, we often get questions about how to distinguish run-of-the-mill consultants and others from great trademark attorneys. After all - when you're looking for an attorney to file or prosecute your business trademark, you should know their qualifications. Here are three ways you can separate the proverbial wheat from the chaff when it comes to trademark attorneys.

It's crucial to seek legal advice from a licensed trademark lawyer rather than relying on advice from non-professionals like trademark consultants. The USPTO even recommends hiring an attorney to help with the trademark process. Although trademark consultants may provide advice on trademark availability or name marketability, they cannot file the trademark for you or offer legal advice. According to the Rules of Practicing in trademark cases, "Individuals who are not attorneys are not recognized to practice before the Office in trademark matters." This rule applies to individuals who assist trademark applicants.

When searching for a trademark attorney, it's important to find someone with a strong background in trademark law. Look for an attorney who specializes in this area and has significant experience handling trademark-related cases. Avoid lawyers who don't have expertise in this field, as they may not be able to provide the guidance and support you need.

Ensure your attorney provides updates throughout the trademark registration process to avoid missing deadlines, including responding to any Office actions within six months. Failure to do so can result in trademark abandonment. The USPTO will only correspond with the listed attorney of record, so make sure your attorney keeps you informed.

In summary:

  • Be sure you're using a licensed trademark attorney helping clients in Hamilton, Ontario.
  • It's best to work with a trademark lawyer who has years of experience filing trademarks.
  • Ensure that your trademark lawyer is willing to provide ongoing notifications relating to your trademark application process.
Trademark Registration Lawyer Hamilton, Ontario

Trademark Attorneys Working Hard for You

Building your brand and gaining recognition for it is a significant achievement, and it's important to protect it. However, there are certain pitfalls and mistakes that can arise, causing you to lose your rights to the mark that represents it. By working with knowledgeable trademark attorneys, you can avoid these issues and file your trademark successfully.

With an A+ rating from the Better Business Bureau (BBB), Sausser Summers, PC, offers comprehensive guidance, strategic advice, and reliable representation for a variety of trademark matters. Our attorneys have years of real-world experience and, having registered countless trademarks with the USPTO, provide our clients with individualized representation when they need it most.

If you're looking for skilled, adept, and experienced counsel, look no further than our trademark law firm. Contact us today to schedule your initial consultation and learn how we can help you safeguard your brand.

Latest News in Hamilton, Ontario

Hamilton’s New Affordable Watch Revives a Coveted On-Screen Timepiece

Step aside, Murph, the “Oppenheimer” is here.ShareHamilton’s Hollywood connection is well documented. The Swiss watchmaker has seemingly racked up more screen time than all of its competitors combined.Unlike the carefully coordinated releases of Indiana Jones’s Boulton and Murph, Hamilton’s latest cinematic watch comes more than three years after the film’s release, and only in response to popular demand.According to Hamilton, the new Classic Cushion Collection was developed in...

Step aside, Murph, the “Oppenheimer” is here.

Share

Hamilton’s Hollywood connection is well documented. The Swiss watchmaker has seemingly racked up more screen time than all of its competitors combined.

Unlike the carefully coordinated releases of Indiana Jones’s Boulton and Murph, Hamilton’s latest cinematic watch comes more than three years after the film’s release, and only in response to popular demand.

According to Hamilton, the new Classic Cushion Collection was developed in response to unexpected demand for a watch worn in the 2023 film Oppenheimer.

While portraying Robert Oppenheimer, Cillian Murphy wore a restored vintage Cushion B from the 1930s. Hamilton’s Cushion case dates back to 1919, making it a contemporary of the Cartier Tank and other Jazz Age dress watches.

Rather than make a purely faithful reproduction of the Cushion B, Hamilton tactfully refined the design for a modern audience. The cushion shape is unchanged, offered in 30mm by 30mm and 34mm by 34mm, but a more defined bezel creates a sharper silhouette.

The dial is now TV-shaped, matching the contours of the case. A printed railroad track, boxy Art Deco numerals and cathedral hands remain, joined by a new small seconds dial.

Four of the six debut references present the same basic design, with the numerals and hand inlays coated in a green-tinted lume. The 34mm case comes in PVD-gold with a white dial and steel with a black dial, while the 30mm presents the same white dial with a PVD-gold case or a steel case.

At a press event, Hamilton explained that it took over three years to bring the Cushion collection back to life because there was no mechanical movement in production that could fit inside the case. So the brand developed the new Caliber H-42 hand-wound movement, which provides an impressive 57-hour power reserve.

Etched in

By far, the most ornate variation comes in the 34mm size. An etched Art Deco leaf motif covers the entire stainless steel case.

The silver dial features sunburst brushing emanating from the small seconds, and the hour numerals differ with an italicized lean. It comes on a black leather pin buckle strap.

Roman holiday

When I had the pleasure of previewing the entire American Classic Cushion collection, the one that jumped out to me featured a 30mm case with a white dial and a printed black Roman numeral hour track.

Thanks to Cartier, I prefer Roman numerals on an Art Deco-inspired rectangular or cushion case. At $995, this 30mm beauty makes an excellent Cartier alternative for a fraction of the price.

Availability and price

Hamilton lists the American Classic Cushion collection as “Available Soon” on its American website, but it is already available in Australia and the UK, so the wait shouldn’t be long. All four steel cases, even the etched one, cost $995, and the PVD-gold duo costs $1,095.

FIA reaches verdict on Hamilton following Bortoleto impeding incident in FP2

The FIA has announced the outcome of its investigation into Lewis Hamilton after the Ferrari driver impeded Gabriel Bortoleto during FP2 for the Bahrain Grand Prix at Sepang.The incident occurred during the latter stages of FP2, when Hamilton found himself in Bortoleto’s path as the Audi driver approached at considerable speed. With the Ferrari travelling slowly ahead, Bortoleto had little choice but to take evasive action and move towards the left-hand side of the circuit to prevent a collision.The situation immed...

The FIA has announced the outcome of its investigation into Lewis Hamilton after the Ferrari driver impeded Gabriel Bortoleto during FP2 for the Bahrain Grand Prix at Sepang.

The incident occurred during the latter stages of FP2, when Hamilton found himself in Bortoleto’s path as the Audi driver approached at considerable speed. With the Ferrari travelling slowly ahead, Bortoleto had little choice but to take evasive action and move towards the left-hand side of the circuit to prevent a collision.

The situation immediately prompted an angry response from the Brazilian over the team radio. Bortoleto was particularly frustrated by the fact that Hamilton appeared to have seen him coming but did not clear the racing line in time.

However, after reviewing the incident and taking into account that it took place during a practice session, the FIA opted against handing the Ferrari driver a severe penalty. Hamilton escaped with a warning, meaning no further sporting punishment was imposed on the seven-time world champion. Ferrari were not entirely spared, however, with the team receiving a €10,000 fine in connection with the incident.

ADVERTISEMENT

FIA stewards reveal reasoning behind Hamilton’s Bortoleto verdict

In their explanation, the stewards stated that Hamilton was responsible for the incident, having moved onto the racing line at low speed and unnecessarily impeded Bortoleto as the Audi driver approached at a significantly higher speed. They also took into account several mitigating circumstances, including the damage to Hamilton’s right-hand mirror, the absence of a warning from Ferrari over the radio and the fact that Bortoleto was not completing a push lap.

The stewards also examined the possibility of treating the incident as dangerous impeding due to the large speed difference, but Bortoleto was able to react in time and avoid contact. With those circumstances taken into account, Hamilton was handed a warning, in line with the usual penalty for an impeding offence during practice.

Ferrari, meanwhile, was found to have a separate responsibility for what happened. The stewards noted that the team knew about the damage to Hamilton’s right-hand mirror and therefore should have warned him about faster cars approaching from behind.

That obligation applied regardless of whether the approaching driver was completing a push lap, particularly because Hamilton’s visibility of the traffic behind him had been compromised.

ADVERTISEMENT

Fred Vasseur Responds to Lewis Hamilton on Ferrari Structure as James Vowles Raises Innovations

James Vowles raises the Ferrari innovation in F1 2026, as Frederic Vasseur responds to rumours and relations with his bosses.Vasseur has found support from rival and F1 colleague Williams’ Vowles amid rumours about the Frenchman and his tenure at the Italian manufacturer, who made a special call to defend the Frenchman. After Lewis Hamilton and Charles Leclerc answered the similar question that plagues Ferrari often, the man in the news had to do the same.Before Vasseur could share his thoughts, Williams F1 team principal...

James Vowles raises the Ferrari innovation in F1 2026, as Frederic Vasseur responds to rumours and relations with his bosses.

Vasseur has found support from rival and F1 colleague Williams’ Vowles amid rumours about the Frenchman and his tenure at the Italian manufacturer, who made a special call to defend the Frenchman. After Lewis Hamilton and Charles Leclerc answered the similar question that plagues Ferrari often, the man in the news had to do the same.

Before Vasseur could share his thoughts, Williams F1 team principal Vowles took the opportunity to share his opinion in praise of Ferrari and the innovations brought about in 2026 – something that Hamilton stressed for the Italian manufacturer to do.

Ferrari Innovation Best in F1 2026

Vowles noted how Williams copied the exhaust layout of Ferrari, while the F1 team’s Macarena rear wing has been copied by plenty of other teams on the grid. “I’m just going to add to that,” he said. “Normally, we beat each other up and put knives in our backs, but Ferrari is in the best place it’s been in the championship for a while.

“They have innovation on the car this year with a rear wing and exhaust blowing that we’ve all copied as a result of it. It’s a team that’s doing brilliantly. So, I mean, for me personally, there is no question that Fred is the right person to do this. Obviously, it’s difficult because I haven’t been fully in that position, but from what I can read, yes.

“Fundamentally, I think where it’s different, we all know that, let’s be frank about it, our jobs are on the line. We don’t do a good enough job, that puts us at risk straight away. I think that’s a given. You take that when you take the title. But there’s a difference to how you’re celebrated in success and how you’re punished in failure.

“Generally speaking, we all are. I would say, this is very external when I read it, I would say it’s exaggerated more in a way towards Fred, albeit his predecessors in that role. I think it’s much higher highs, much lower lows. That’s how I see it,” summed up Vowles.

Vasseur Appreciates and Answers Media Queries

Vasseur appreciated the Brit with a ‘thank you’, as he put it on the media for all the questions arising about his future. He expected such a situation anyhow, as he knew it came with a job like his. It is only the personal attacks that he doesn’t wish to happen to anyone.

But he played down the finger-pointing, as Hamilton noted on the hierarchy at Ferrari. The Frenchman said he had a good relationship with both John Elkann and Benedetto Vigna, and that they are in constant touch, playing down any problems with the organization or structure.

On Media For the Rumours –

Vasseur: “I think this you have to ask your colleagues. When you see the noise and all the rumours in the press all the week, I think as a team we need to work in serenity, and it was absolutely not the case. I think the statement was mandatory to do something, or it would have been the same this weekend. But honestly, the big issue that we have today is the stability, the serenity into the team, the focus that we need to have, and not to have this kind of question all the day.”

Structure of the F1 Team, Answers to Hamilton –

Vasseur: “First, about the structure of the team, I think that in the technical equipment at least, it’s a non-end story. It means that you have to improve. I think it’s the DNA of what we are doing, to not take a success as a final situation, but try to improve in the good and the bad moments.

“Honestly, the dynamic that we have, we recruited a lot, but as the other teams, and we are trying to push the limit of everything. On the comment of Lewis, I think it would be a mistake to finger-point someone or something or whatever. In the good moments, we are winning as a team. In the bad moments, we are suffering as a team, and I don’t want to speak about a single individual or whatever.

“Honestly, I think it would be a huge mistake to start to not be unified. We had a good beginning of the season. For sure, it’s not enough. We want to get more, we want to win more, we want to win the championship. But at the end of the day, we had a positive start. We are struggling the last couple of races, but we are hoping to come back soon with development and to be back into the pace.”

Expected to Face Such Questions –

Vasseur: “Thanks to remind me that, I’m starting to be old! No, but for sure, as James said before, when you take the role, you know the positive and the negative side of the job. I was expecting something like this. What is sometimes a bit unfair is when you put someone under the bus, and I’m there also to defend my team, my guys.

“As I said before, when we are winning, we are winning as a team, but when we are struggling, I’m there to defend all of them. I think it’s the right attitude from everybody, from them to defend the Team Principal, from me to defend them when we are struggling. Honestly, I knew what I would get on that. I’m not surprised at all, but sometimes the attacks are a bit personal. It’s not good. We need friendly media.”

Healthy Relation with Bosses –

Vasseur: “Honestly, the relationship that I have with my bosses, Benedetto and John, is a very good one. We are in daily contact, and I can’t complain at all about the organisation. But for sure, you always want to get more, you always want to do more, you always want to recruit more too.”

“I think it’s true for me and it’s true for everybody on the grid, that you always want to do more because it’s the DNA of what we are doing. But honestly, it has nothing to do with the organisation.”

Matthew Mayich's Arizona teammates dispute school report on workout before Hamilton NHL prospect's collapse

An anonymous letter by members of Arizona State University's hockey team that was sent to the school's president disputes aspects of ASU's official report into events that led up to Canadian NHL prospect Matthew Mayich's collapse.In the review released last week, ASU official James Rund wrote that the Hamilton-born 21-year-old collapsed just before 8:30 a.m. during Aug. 20 training at Sun Angel Stadium on ASU’s Tempe campus. It also determined ASU hockey coaches didn't submit a plan for review by trainers before the training ses...

An anonymous letter by members of Arizona State University's hockey team that was sent to the school's president disputes aspects of ASU's official report into events that led up to Canadian NHL prospect Matthew Mayich's collapse.

In the review released last week, ASU official James Rund wrote that the Hamilton-born 21-year-old collapsed just before 8:30 a.m. during Aug. 20 training at Sun Angel Stadium on ASU’s Tempe campus. It also determined ASU hockey coaches didn't submit a plan for review by trainers before the training session.

The players said in the letter that they had it sent anonymously Monday to ASU president Michael M. Crow through their lawyer, Timothy J. Casey, as they feared retribution.

It alleges that Mayich "received no water" during the outdoor workout on a hot day last month, and calls for the university to place the trainers "responsible for approving, conducting and supervising the session" on leave pending an independent investigation.

The players' letter says that, to "our knowledge, no one involved has been placed on leave, suspended or disciplined. The head coach who selected the instructor and scheduled the session continues to lead our program."

It urges that the team's coaching staff be replaced "for the period of the investigation if the facts set out in this report, together with what the investigation finds, indicate that step is appropriate."

Also on Monday, the Arizona State Legislature's House and Senate education chairs, Republicans Matt Gress and Hildy Angius, announced on X that they're calling for an independent investigation into the Aug. 20 training session. In a news release, they said they have asked the state's Board of Regents to retain an independent investigator.

Mayich struggled near end of workout, ASU report says

According to Rund's report, during the workout, a "break was taken approximately 20 minutes into the event for the student athletes to drink water." However, the letter from the players alleges "Matthew, and many of us, did not get water at any point."

Rund, ASU's senior vice-president of educational outreach and student services, said coaches asked permission for Timothy Ziesel, who was there for the workout and had "spoken with the ASU hockey team in the 2025-26 season about topics of leadership and teamwork," to speak to the team.

However, the coaches didn't "submit a plan of training activities for review by ASU’s strength and conditioning coaches" before training began, Rund said.

Near the end of the workout, "Matthew appeared to struggle, and then in rapid succession stumbled, dropped the medicine ball and fell to the ground," Rund wrote. "He attempted to get up and resume running, but fell to his knees."

Rund also announced that ASU would have a panel of experts provide best-practice recommendations.

The players' letter alleges that when "those of us who reached the water drank, Ziesel stood behind us and declared that he did not get water in combat."

The players also ask for answers to 19 questions, including:

Mayich family 'grateful' to teammates

In a statement shared with media Tuesday afternoon by Rob Carey, the Mayich family's lawyer, Matthew's parents, John and Christina, said they were “so grateful to Matthew's teammates. A lot of you have come by, sent messages and kept Matthew in your thoughts every day. It means more to us than we can say."

The family said they "want this [hockey] team to have a great season, and we'll be cheering for you. But the coaches who ran that workout on Aug. 20 need to be removed while an independent investigation gets to the truth. The players shouldn't have to worry about retaliation from the people they report to every day."

In their letter, the players also made several requests, including that:

When asked for comment, Chris Fiscus, ASU vice-president of media relations and strategic communications, told CBC News on Tuesday afternoon that the university "will respond later today." At the time of publication, no response had been provided.

Family 'praying for a miracle'

Last week, Carey said "Matthew is in stable but critical condition still. The family is still praying for a miracle, but nothing has significantly changed. But even if that happens, we will never have the young man who came to Arizona last month, a hockey star and ... a wonderful person."

According to Carey, "when Matthew went down [during the workout], there was no plan and no preparation, so he was treated in a way that hurt his chances rather than helped them."

"A month later, nobody's been named, nobody's been suspended, nobody's been fired for violating the very policies ASU published today, and the university wants to appoint a committee."

Mayich played minor hockey with the Hamilton Huskies between 2016 and 2020. He was selected in the sixth round of the 2023 NHL draft by the St. Louis Blues.

Doug Armstrong, the Blues' president of hockey operations, said in a news release in late August, "The entire Blues organization is keeping Matthew Mayich close to our hearts as we pray for his comfort and recovery while he continues to undergo medical treatment in Arizona."

The organization also extends its "deepest support" to his family, friends and teammates during this difficult time, Armstrong said.

Stelco's U.S. owner defends right to idle operations at Hamilton steel plant as PM vows legal action

The chief executive officer of Stelco’s American parent company says "we will defend ourselves" if Ottawa files a lawsuit after it said it will idle production at a steel mill in Hamilton, resulting in up to 500 layoffs, due in part to the bitter trade war between Canada and the U.S.His remarks follow comments from Prime Minister Mark Carney that Ottawa will "use all powers that we have" against Cleveland-Cliffs as it pursues the Ohio-based company to the "fullest extent of the law."In an int...

The chief executive officer of Stelco’s American parent company says "we will defend ourselves" if Ottawa files a lawsuit after it said it will idle production at a steel mill in Hamilton, resulting in up to 500 layoffs, due in part to the bitter trade war between Canada and the U.S.

His remarks follow comments from Prime Minister Mark Carney that Ottawa will "use all powers that we have" against Cleveland-Cliffs as it pursues the Ohio-based company to the "fullest extent of the law."

In an interview with CBC News on Wednesday, Cleveland-Cliffs CEO Lourenco Goncalves called Stelco’s ability to freely sell steel produced in Hamilton to U.S. buyers an "underlying condition" to terms it agreed to when it purchased the company in 2024. Those include maintaining "significant employment levels in Canada" and "significant operations in Hamilton."

The Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) was in place by the time of the purchase, Goncalves said.

"We had the ability to sell into the United States," he said. "That was an underlying condition for me to acquire Stelco.

"I would not have acquired the Stelco if I knew that Canada and the United States would become what they became — enemies in trade."

Despite the current trade war, CUSMA remains in effect. Though the U.S. broke off talks on a renewal in July, the tripartite trade agreement stands until 2036.

WATCH | PM vows to fight Stelco shutdown:

Prime Minister Mark Carney says Canada will 'use all the powers that we have' to ensure that Stelco meets its 'legal obligations for employment.' The company, which is owned by U.S.-based Cleveland-Cliffs, announced plans on Monday to idle some production at its Hamilton plant, putting hundreds of workers out of a ‌job.

"I believe that I'm acting within the boundaries of what I can do as a responsible business owner," Goncalves said in a followup interview on Thursday.

He said he will answer Carney "in court once the lawsuit is presented to me."

Layoffs linked to trade war

Stelco directly linked its plan to cut up to 500 jobs with U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war with Canada.

The Trump administration imposed 50 per cent tariffs on foreign steel under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act last year. Canada has retaliated with duties on many U.S.-made steel products.

Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Carney singled out Goncalves for "applauding" Trump's move to impose punishing tariffs on Canadian steel imports to the United States.

Goncalves has said his support for Trump was not at odds with his support for steel workers in Canada.

"America first is not America only," he said Wednesday. "Canadians need to understand that people like me that invest money in Canada are not going there to screw them up. We are there because we believe in the country. We believe in the people. We believe in the workforce."

Cleveland-Cliffs acquired Stelco in a $3.4-billion cash-and-stock deal that closed in November 2024. In a news release announcing the deal, Stelco's then-CEO Alan Kestenbaum stated the transaction "keeps national interests at the forefront and recognizes the importance of the workforce."

No orders, or not enough?

Goncalves says foreign steel imports to Canada have put pressure on the market for Stelco's cold-rolled steel production.

"We do not have a market that could accommodate all the participants in the marketplace, mainly the two big ones, Stelco and ArcelorMittal Dofasco, together with a number of tonnes of imported steel coming through the borders, and sell that altogether in the Canadian domestic market.

"So we have decided to go ahead and concentrate on hot-rolled products."

Pressed on whether Stelco was turning away orders, Goncalves said there were no orders: "We can't turn down something that does not exist."

But a source inside Stelco told CBC News the company has customers wanting to place orders. Another industry insider said Canada’s steel industry at large continues to get orders of flat-rolled galvanized steel. CBC News is not naming these sources due concerns related to their respective employers.

Goncalves said Thursday he meant "there are not enough orders at a price level that makes sense for a business to be run."

Carney has said there is "money on the table" to help companies like Stelco blunt the impact of the ongoing trade war, but Goncalves says that's not what his company needs.

"The problem is not lack of money. It's not like Stelco is running out of cash," he said, restating that the core issue is the uncertainty in Canada-U.S. trade. "There's no money that could resolve that."

Disclaimer:

This website publishes news articles that contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. The non-commercial use of these news articles for the purposes of local news reporting constitutes "Fair Use" of the copyrighted materials as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
Trademark Legal Fees Hamilton, Ontario

Resources