lm-double-shapeSausser Summers, PC

Providing CA trademark services throughout the CA and across the globe.
  • Lower Cost
  • Faster Process
  • Experienced Trademark Attorneys

File a Trademark for $399 + $250 Government Filing Fee

Trademark Attorney Working With Clients in London, Ontario

If you're an entrepreneur, you know that protecting your intellectual property should be high on your list when it comes to safeguarding your company. However, as a successful business owner, you also know the steps and costs of filing a trademark in the CA can be expensive and arduous.

This conundrum can be even more overwhelming for new business owners who want to do everything possible to minimize the price of securing trademarks. They try to handle complicated tasks like trademark registration on their own, which can be a big mistake - especially when juggling the day-to-day tasks of running a business. You may be thinking, "But what about those set-it-and-forget-it services you can find online? All you have to do is plug in your info, and you're done." Using pre-made templates for trademark filing can be tempting, but doing so can leave you with inadequate protection and hurt you in the long run.

So, what is the easiest, most cost-effective route to consider that also minimizes legal risk? The truth is, before you spend money on an online filing service, it's best to consult with a trademark attorney working with clients in London, Ontario.

At Sausser Summers, PC, our experienced trademark attorneys can help you understand the trademark process step by step. We can even help with CA trademark filing, CA trademark responses, and CA trademark renewals at a price you can actually afford. That way, you can make an informed decision regarding your business without having to break the bank.

Sausser Summers, PC: Simplifying the CA Trademark Process

Hiring an attorney can be a daunting task, but at Sausser Summers, PC, our goal is to make the process as simple and seamless as possible for you. That's why we offer a straightforward checkout service. First, you choose your flat fee trademark service and fill out a short questionnaire. Then, we will contact you within 24 hours to discuss the details of our service. From there, one of our experienced trademark attorneys will get to work on your behalf.

Using a trademark attorney for filing in London, Ontario, can significantly increase your chances of a successful registration. The CA government recommends hiring a trademark attorney to help with your application, and our team of trademark lawyers is dedicated to meeting your needs. In fact, we help ensure your application is filed correctly the first time so you can get on with your life and avoid legal risks.

At Sausser Summers, PC, we work closely with our clients to understand their needs and provide them with sound professional advice. We never offer incomplete services, such as simply filing for registration, because that would leave you open to legal risks. You can rely on us to handle your intellectual property matters, and our flat fee services can help protect your business in a simple, straightforward, and affordable way. It's really that simple.

In terms of filing a CA trademark, we provide an easy three-step process to protect your intellectual property:

1. You provide your trademark info to our team via an online form.

2. Our team performs a comprehensive trademark search. This search ensures that no other marks will prevent you from registering your trademark in the CA Once performed, we'll send you a legal opinion letter that details our findings.

3. Sausser Summers, PC, files your CA trademark application. We are then listed as your Attorney of Record on file. From there, we'll provide ongoing updates regarding the status of your trademark as it works through the registration process.

The bottom line? At Sausser Summers, PC, we give both new and seasoned business owners an easy, efficient, cost-effective way to protect the one asset that sets them apart from others: their name.

Online Trademark Attorney London, Ontario
The bottom line?

At Sausser Summers, PC, we give both new and seasoned business owners an easy, efficient, cost-effective way to protect the one asset that sets them apart from others: their name.

Do I Really Need a Trademark Attorney for Protecting My Business in London, Ontario?

It's not necessary to be a lawyer in order to apply for a trademark. Anyone can submit a trademark application to the CA Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). However, registering a trademark involves more than just filling out a form. It's essential to conduct thorough research, accurately identify and clearly explain your trademark to ensure it receives adequate protection. And even after securing a trademark, you've got to monitor it consistently to make sure it's free from infringement.

The big takeaway here is that it's always a good idea to work with a trademark attorney to protect the intellectual property that you've worked so hard to establish. According to the Wall Street Journal, applicants are approximately 50% more likely to secure their trademark than people who file applications on their own. If your trademark application is rejected by the USPTO, you will need to revise and refile it, incurring additional filing fees. To avoid delays and extra costs, it is best to have a trademark lawyer help you get it right the first time.

Additional Benefits of Using a Trademark Attorney

Great trademark attorneys (like those you'll find at Sausser Summers, PC) will help with every step of filing and enforcing your trademark. Some additional benefits include the following:

Check to see if your proposed trademark is registered by another entity.

Conduct research to see if another business is using the trademark for which you're applying.

Provide advice and guidance on the strength of your trademark.

Draft and submit your trademark applications and application revisions.

Advice and guidance regarding trademark maintenance and protection.

Monitor the market for unauthorized use of your trademark.

Trademark enforcement to protect you against infringement.

Online Trademark Lawyer London, Ontario

Curious whether our trademark attorney services are right for you and your business? Contact Sausser Summer, PC, today. Let's talk about what you need, and how we can help.

What About Online Filing Services?

Online services, can provide you with basic assistance in filing your trademark. However, they will never be a legitimate substitute for an experienced trademark attorney helping clients in London, Ontario.

Trademark Attorney London, Ontario

Although online filing services offer a step-by-step process, they take a one-size-fits-all approach to preparing legal documents. Even their advanced service only provides basic attorney assistance in completing your paperwork and helping with minor roadblocks. Online filing services' disclaimer highlights the many limitations of its services, including the fact that communications are not protected by attorney-client privilege. In addition, online filing services cannot provide advice, explanations, opinions, recommendations, or any kind of legal guidance on possible legal rights, remedies, defenses, options, selection of forms or strategies.

In other words, online filing services can offer you the necessary forms and point you in the right direction, but they cannot customize their services to your specific needs or help you with serious complications that may arise.

For the most comprehensive trademark service and protection, it's always wise to work with highly rated trademark lawyers, like you'll find at Sausser Summers, PC.

Understanding Trademarks Over Time

Trademarks in the CA can last indefinitely, but did you know that clients in London, Ontario can file a trademark online, only to lose protection in some circumstances? Trademarks differ from patents and copyrights in that they do not have an expiration date. However, to prevent the cancellation of a trademark, you must maintain it. To ensure that your trademark remains protected, you must actively use it in commerce and renew it with the USPTO every ten years.

The Lanham Act tells us that "use in commerce" is the legitimate use of a trademark in the ordinary course of trade. In other words, you cannot register a trademark solely to reserve the rights to it in the future. In most cases, a trademark must be used continuously in connection with the goods or services it is registered for.

Trademark Law Firm London, Ontario

Steps to Renew Your Trademark

Trademarks are registered with the USPTO and generally need to be renewed every ten years. However, there is one crucial exception that you should be aware of. Within the first ten years of owning a trademark, you must file for renewal between the fifth and sixth year from the date of your initial registration.

During this renewal period, you are required to submit a Section 8 declaration, a specimen that shows how the mark is being used, and pay the required fee. You can also apply for Section 15 Incontestability status, which can strengthen your trademark rights. This application, although not mandatory, can make it harder for others to challenge your ownership of the mark.

After the first renewal, which falls between the fifth and sixth year of ownership, the next renewal filing is due between the ninth and tenth year, and then every tenth year thereafter. In the ninth year you will need to file a Section 8 declaration, attesting to your use of the mark or excusable nonuse. You've also got to file a Section 9 renewal application before the end of the tenth year to keep your registration active.

It is worth noting that the USPTO provides a six-month grace period if you fail to renew your mark within the required time frame, but it is best not to rely on it. If you don't file within the grace period time limits, the USPTO will cancel and expire your mark.

By hiring trademark attorneys helping clients in London, Ontario, you can avoid the pitfalls and mistakes that can arise and cause you to lose your rights to the mark that represents it.

Losing Your Trademark Rights Through Abandonment

In the event that you stop using your trademark and have no plans to resume using it in commerce, it may be considered abandoned by the USPTO. This could result in the loss of your protective rights to the mark. Typically, a trademark is assumed to be abandoned if it has not been used for three years. However, you may be able to refute this presumption by providing evidence that you intend to use the mark again in the future.

Losing Your Trademark Rights Through Inappropriate Licensing

In addition to trademark abandonment, you should also be wary of improper licensing. It's important to remember that once you allow someone else to use your trademark, you must keep an eye on how they use it. You should monitor the products or services that feature your trademark to ensure that they meet consumers' expectations in terms of quality. Failure to do so can lead to a "naked" trademark license and the loss of your protective trademark rights.

How to Avoid Having to Refile Your Trademark

If you're wondering how you can avoid refiling your trademark, the answer is simple: file it correctly the first time around. Filing a trademark isn't inherently difficult, but when doing so, it's very important that certain aspects are filled out accurately in your application. If any information is missing or incorrect, the trademark application may be considered "void ab initio" or void from the beginning, requiring you to file again.

To avoid this, make sure that the information you provide in the application is accurate and complete, including the ownership of the trademark. For instance, if a corporation has multiple shareholders, it should not file under the President's personal name. The rightful owner should be the one/entity that ultimately controls the trademark and the associated goods/services.

It is also important to ensure that the goods and/or services description is precise. For example, if you sell electronic products, you should not file for research and development services despite having a research and development department. The goods/services description should reflect the goods/services you offer to customers, not the departments within your business.

Additionally, providing accurate dates of first use when filing for a trademark is crucial. The USPTO requires two dates to be specified - the date of first use anywhere and the date of first use in interstate commerce. Contact our trademark law office today to learn more about having accurate dates on your filing paperwork.

Trademark Lawyer London, Ontario
Trademark Firm London, Ontario

What Makes an Online Trademark Attorney Great?

At Sausser Summers, PC, we often get questions about how to distinguish run-of-the-mill consultants and others from great trademark attorneys. After all - when you're looking for an attorney to file or prosecute your business trademark, you should know their qualifications. Here are three ways you can separate the proverbial wheat from the chaff when it comes to trademark attorneys.

It's crucial to seek legal advice from a licensed trademark lawyer rather than relying on advice from non-professionals like trademark consultants. The USPTO even recommends hiring an attorney to help with the trademark process. Although trademark consultants may provide advice on trademark availability or name marketability, they cannot file the trademark for you or offer legal advice. According to the Rules of Practicing in trademark cases, "Individuals who are not attorneys are not recognized to practice before the Office in trademark matters." This rule applies to individuals who assist trademark applicants.

When searching for a trademark attorney, it's important to find someone with a strong background in trademark law. Look for an attorney who specializes in this area and has significant experience handling trademark-related cases. Avoid lawyers who don't have expertise in this field, as they may not be able to provide the guidance and support you need.

Ensure your attorney provides updates throughout the trademark registration process to avoid missing deadlines, including responding to any Office actions within six months. Failure to do so can result in trademark abandonment. The USPTO will only correspond with the listed attorney of record, so make sure your attorney keeps you informed.

In summary:

  • Be sure you're using a licensed trademark attorney helping clients in London, Ontario.
  • It's best to work with a trademark lawyer who has years of experience filing trademarks.
  • Ensure that your trademark lawyer is willing to provide ongoing notifications relating to your trademark application process.
Trademark Registration Lawyer London, Ontario

Trademark Attorneys Working Hard for You

Building your brand and gaining recognition for it is a significant achievement, and it's important to protect it. However, there are certain pitfalls and mistakes that can arise, causing you to lose your rights to the mark that represents it. By working with knowledgeable trademark attorneys, you can avoid these issues and file your trademark successfully.

With an A+ rating from the Better Business Bureau (BBB), Sausser Summers, PC, offers comprehensive guidance, strategic advice, and reliable representation for a variety of trademark matters. Our attorneys have years of real-world experience and, having registered countless trademarks with the USPTO, provide our clients with individualized representation when they need it most.

If you're looking for skilled, adept, and experienced counsel, look no further than our trademark law firm. Contact us today to schedule your initial consultation and learn how we can help you safeguard your brand.

Latest News in London, Ontario

Accused in alleged $60M London, Ont., hospital fraud deny wrongdoing

Former employees being sued by the southwestern Ontario's largest hospital network for their alleged involvement in a $60 million fraud scheme are denying the accusations in a statement of defence filed in court.Last summer, London Health Science Centre's (LHSC) filed two civil lawsuits against five of its former executives and their close contacts in what it calls a "decade-long fraud scheme."The hospital alleges its former director of facilities, Dipesh Patel, awarded multiple contracts over the years to his "p...

Former employees being sued by the southwestern Ontario's largest hospital network for their alleged involvement in a $60 million fraud scheme are denying the accusations in a statement of defence filed in court.

Last summer, London Health Science Centre's (LHSC) filed two civil lawsuits against five of its former executives and their close contacts in what it calls a "decade-long fraud scheme."

The hospital alleges its former director of facilities, Dipesh Patel, awarded multiple contracts over the years to his "personal contact," Paresh Soni, who ran seven different companies and is also named in the lawsuit.

LHSC is seeking $50 million in damages, as well as all the profits that those named made, and all of the salaries that each made during the time the alleged fraud was being run.

It's also suing three executives who it alleges knew about the fraud in April 2022 but did nothing about it, according to a second lawsuit filed for $10 million. The lawsuit named Abhi Mukherjee, the hospital's former chief financial officer, Jackie Schleifer Taylor, former CEO, and Bradley Campbell, the corporate hospital administrative executive.

Here are the responses laid out in the accused's statement of defence:

Jackie Schleifer Taylor - Former CEO

In her statement of defence, Schleifer Taylor, LHSC's CEO from 2021 until 2024, argues no one made her aware of the alleged fraudulent activity and that LHSC's allegations are a "bad faith attempt" to circumvent obligations to past employees and repay debts.

The defence statement said LHSC is trying to recoup funds for the large exit payouts it had to pay to several key employees over the years, along with spending and deficit from years prior to Schleifer Taylor's tenure.

It adds that Schleifer Taylor acted with diligence and a high degree of commitment to her role. She understood, at all times, which issues needed to be escalated and addressed with either external resources, the hospital's board of directors or other senior executives.

"At no time did Dr. Schleifer Taylor's team make her aware of the alleged fraudulent activity set out in the Statement of Claim, nor could Dr. Schleifer Taylor reasonably have suspected the alleged fraudulent activity," it said. "As such, there was nothing for her to report to the Board."

Schleifer Taylor alleges she sought legal advice from LHSC's lawyers when she learned about the fraud investigation but they did not give any recommendations to notify LHSC's internal audit department, the document said.

Abhijeet (Abhi) Mukherjee - Former CFO

Mukherjee was the hospital's CFO from 2022 to 2024. In his statement of defence, he denies "each and every allegation" and alleges LHSC only filed the lawsuit in retaliation after he sued the hospital for wrongful termination in 2024.

Calling the hospital's allegations "baseless and entirely without merit," the statement said LHSC's lawsuit fails to prove the material facts necessary to find any liability against Mukherjee.

"Despite claiming damages estimated 'in the range of $10 million' in the first paragraph of the Statement of Claim, LHSC offers no explanation whatsoever as to how Mr. Mukherjee is somehow responsible, either in fact or at law, for any such damages at all," the document said.

Paresh Soni - BH Contractors and GBI Facilities Management

Soni is listed in LHSC's lawsuit as the owner of companies called BH Contractors and GBI Facilities Management.

He denies being a "close personal contact" of Dipesh Patel, another defendant named in the suit, and said the two were "at most, casual acquaintances" when they met in 2013 and did not share financial endeavours at the time.

Soni alleges the idea for BH was Patel's, who controlled all major aspects of its operations as the company's defacto officer and director.

Soni said he was not involved in drafting a competitive bidding exemption to bypass LHSC's procurement process nor did he consult with Patel to artificially inflate the amounts charged by his company, GBI Facilities Management, to bill LHSC for work that wasn't done.

"LHSC’s allegation that GBI Data invoiced it for services relating to a reporting system that 'did not exist' is disingenuous and false," the statement of defence said.

Derek Lall - former director of facility management

Lall worked at LHSC between 2014 and 2023 and eventually became the director of facilities, where he reported directly to Dipesh Patel.

He acknowledges that he managed capital projects but denies benefitting in any way from the alleged fraud scheme. Lall said he considered Patel a good friend and mentor whom he trusted.

He said Patel was insistent on having the company BL Hanna, which later became BH Contractors, hired to do work at LHSC, and despite Lall warning him that Hanna didn't meet criteria, he hired them regardless of a strict procurement process.

"Patel also made it clear to Lall that he expected Lall to go along with his wishes. Lall states that at the time he felt compelled to follow Patel’s instructions or directions, given that Patel was his immediate supervisor," the document said.

"Patel made Lall feel that his job would be at risk if Lall did not essentially 'turn a blind eye' to any preferential treatment toward BH Contractors."

Lall insists he did not breach any fiduciary duty, nor was he part of any conspiracy to defraud the hospital, adding that he had no personal or business relationship with co-defendants Nilesh Modi or Paresh Soni. He said he had "absolutely nothing to do with suspicious property holdings."

Bradley Campbell - former corporate administrative executive

Bradley Campbell was the hospital's corporate hospital administrative executive from 2022 to 2024. He claims LHSC's lawsuit constitutes an "abuse of power" and was launched to retaliate against Campbell for a separate wrongful dismissal case.

"Campbell was not aware, and had no reason to be aware, of any alleged fraud being perpetrated against LHSC," the statement said, adding that any damages the hospital suffered happened when Campbell was not an LHSC employee.

He argues he was providing the hospital with consulting services through his company Corpus Sanchez International Consultancy Inc. Campbell said he learned of a potential fraud investigation through one of LHSC's Human Resources executives, but does not recall a written copy being shared of the report mentioned in the hospital's allegations.

Campbell said the damages LHSC has suffered was due to its own negligence and failure to monitor financial activities.

Other individuals accused, Dipesh Patel, his wife Varsha Patel and Nilesh Modi have all filed a notice of intent to defend.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Isha Bhargava is a multiplatform reporter for CBC News and has worked for its Ontario newsrooms in Toronto and London. She loves telling current affairs and human interest stories. You can reach her at isha.bhargava@cbc.ca

Peace: Funding boost little solace for Ontario's small universities

In history, we teach students to assess, interpret,evaluateand present evidence. These are core life skills. They anchor careers in law,politicsand business. To teach them well, students need to read, write, and discuss… a lot. You can’t ChatGPT your way to a history degree.Teaching history well requires smaller class sizes than many large universities are prepared to provide.The good news is that we have effective models to efficiently deliver this type of education.Here in London, enrollment at Western Uni...

In history, we teach students to assess, interpret,evaluateand present evidence. These are core life skills. They anchor careers in law,politicsand business. To teach them well, students need to read, write, and discuss… a lot. You can’t ChatGPT your way to a history degree.

Teaching history well requires smaller class sizes than many large universities are prepared to provide.

The good news is that we have effective models to efficiently deliver this type of education.

Here in London, enrollment at Western University’s two liberal arts universities, Huron and King’s, has been booming. Not only that, but they are also cost effective. On a per student basis, Huron and King’s spend about $24,000 per undergraduate student, nearly $10,000 less than Ontario’s larger universities, while – at the same time – providing the small class environment necessary for learning in the age of AI.

Revenues, unfortunately, present a similar gap. Small universities have fewer revenue streams than their larger counterparts and affiliated universities, such as Huron and King’s, also have difficult local politics to navigate.

The core solution to Ontario’s crisis in higher education is simply more money. Ontario’s universities are efficient but – relative to other Canadian institutions – our province still does not adequately support them. Last week’s announcement was helpful, but it did not go far enough.

Money will only fix part of the problem, though. Ontario’s affiliated universities demonstrate an opportunity to meet both financial and educational need in our post-secondary landscape by investing in small-scale universities, both affiliated with larger institutions like Western, but also standalone institutions that can provide small-class learning.

The balance sheets suggest that this can be just as affordable as – if not more than – larger campuses, and the personal, student-centred learning model promises outcomes to meet the challenges AI presents.

Small universities matter. They promise rich learning environments for students and important community-strengthening opportunities beyond the GTA. Now is the time to build on this month’s announcement with a renewed vision for Ontario’s university sector.

Thomas Peace is president of the faculty association at Huron University and an associate professor in the department of history

London isn't just the Forest City anymore. It's this year's Forest Capital of Canada

London's nickname as 'The Forest City' just became more official after the Canadian Institute of Forestry named it the 2026 Forest Capital of Canada.London was selected for leading the way in areas such as forest conservation and management, and environmental stewardship.“London’s urban forest is a defining part of our city and a source of pride for our residents,” London Mayor Josh Morgan said in a statement.“Being named the Forest Capital of Canada is an honour, one that reflects how we live up ...

London's nickname as 'The Forest City' just became more official after the Canadian Institute of Forestry named it the 2026 Forest Capital of Canada.

London was selected for leading the way in areas such as forest conservation and management, and environmental stewardship.

“London’s urban forest is a defining part of our city and a source of pride for our residents,” London Mayor Josh Morgan said in a statement.

“Being named the Forest Capital of Canada is an honour, one that reflects how we live up to our nickname and reflects the hard work, dedication, and passion of our community, city staff, and the many partners who help care for and grow our urban forest."

A commemorative Forest Capital of Canada plaque was unveiled at London City Hall on Wednesday.

The Canadian Institute of Forestry gives out the designation annually, and requires communities to submit a business case proving its capacity to host "a 12- to 24-month celebration of forest resources," according the organization's website.

"It is a very competitive award, so we're really fortunate to be receiving it," said Paul Yeoman, the city's Director of Parks and Forestry. "We're also really proud that we're the the first large urban that's been awarded, especially in southwestern Ontario."

Yeoman said building the case for the award had been in the works for a couple of years.

Previous winners include the Mackenzie Region of Northwest Alberta, which won in both 2024 and 2025, and the Greater Fredericton Area of New Brunswick in 2023.

Seven million trees

London is home to seven million public and private trees, said Yeoman. The tree canopy covers around 27 per cent of the area within the city's urban growth boundary, and the city has a goal of increasing that to 34 per cent in the next four decades.

"We're really proud that when you drive into the city, you really do notice the canopy," Yeoman said. "Particularly in the fall, it's absolutely beautiful."

The city also manages 290 woodland areas, and 21 Environmentally Significant Areas, he added.

As this year's Forest Capital, that massive tree coverage will now be showcased through a series of events, including tree giveaways, and "treevnings" (trees in the evening), a series of educational talks with topics like the importance of trees, and tending to fruit trees at home.

Events will also be held for National Forest Week from September 20 to 26. A full list of the events and dates can be found on the city's website.

As the designation is awarded yearly, Yeoman said London will be vying to win it again after this year. "We'll just continue to do the great work to carry it on next year as well."

Disclaimer:

This website publishes news articles that contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. The non-commercial use of these news articles for the purposes of local news reporting constitutes "Fair Use" of the copyrighted materials as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
Trademark Legal Fees London, Ontario

Resources