lm-double-shapeSausser Summers, PC

Providing U.S. trademark services throughout the U.S. and across the globe.
  • Lower Cost
  • Faster Process
  • Experienced Trademark Attorneys

File a Trademark for $399 + $250 Government Filing Fee

Trademark Attorney Working With Clients in Longueuil, Quebec

If you're an entrepreneur, you know that protecting your intellectual property should be high on your list when it comes to safeguarding your company. However, as a successful business owner, you also know the steps and costs of filing a trademark in the U.S. can be expensive and arduous.

This conundrum can be even more overwhelming for new business owners who want to do everything possible to minimize the price of securing trademarks. They try to handle complicated tasks like trademark registration on their own, which can be a big mistake - especially when juggling the day-to-day tasks of running a business. You may be thinking, "But what about those set-it-and-forget-it services you can find online? All you have to do is plug in your info, and you're done." Using pre-made templates for trademark filing can be tempting, but doing so can leave you with inadequate protection and hurt you in the long run.

So, what is the easiest, most cost-effective route to consider that also minimizes legal risk? The truth is, before you spend money on an online filing service, it's best to consult with a trademark attorney working with clients in Longueuil, Quebec.

At Sausser Summers, PC, our experienced trademark attorneys can help you understand the trademark process step by step. We can even help with U.S. trademark filing, U.S. trademark responses, and U.S. trademark renewals at a price you can actually afford. That way, you can make an informed decision regarding your business without having to break the bank.


Sausser Summers, PC: Simplifying the U.S. Trademark Process

Hiring an attorney can be a daunting task, but at Sausser Summers, PC, our goal is to make the process as simple and seamless as possible for you. That's why we offer a straightforward checkout service. First, you choose your flat fee trademark service and fill out a short questionnaire. Then, we will contact you within 24 hours to discuss the details of our service. From there, one of our experienced trademark attorneys will get to work on your behalf.

Using a trademark attorney for filing in Longueuil, Quebec, can significantly increase your chances of a successful registration. The U.S. government recommends hiring a trademark attorney to help with your application, and our team of trademark lawyers is dedicated to meeting your needs. In fact, we help ensure your application is filed correctly the first time so you can get on with your life and avoid legal risks.

At Sausser Summers, PC, we work closely with our clients to understand their needs and provide them with sound professional advice. We never offer incomplete services, such as simply filing for registration, because that would leave you open to legal risks. You can rely on us to handle your intellectual property matters, and our flat fee services can help protect your business in a simple, straightforward, and affordable way. It's really that simple.

In terms of filing a U.S. trademark, we provide an easy three-step process to protect your intellectual property:

1. You provide your trademark info to our team via an online form.

2. Our team performs a comprehensive trademark search. This search ensures that no other marks will prevent you from registering your trademark in the U.S. Once performed, we'll send you a legal opinion letter that details our findings.

3. Sausser Summers, PC, files your U.S. trademark application. We are then listed as your Attorney of Record on file. From there, we'll provide ongoing updates regarding the status of your trademark as it works through the registration process.

The bottom line? At Sausser Summers, PC, we give both new and seasoned business owners an easy, efficient, cost-effective way to protect the one asset that sets them apart from others: their name.

Online Trademark Attorney Longueuil, Quebec
The bottom line?

At Sausser Summers, PC, we give both new and seasoned business owners an easy, efficient, cost-effective way to protect the one asset that sets them apart from others: their name.

Do I Really Need a Trademark Attorney for Protecting My Business in Longueuil, Quebec?

It's not necessary to be a lawyer in order to apply for a trademark. Anyone can submit a trademark application to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). However, registering a trademark involves more than just filling out a form. It's essential to conduct thorough research, accurately identify and clearly explain your trademark to ensure it receives adequate protection. And even after securing a trademark, you've got to monitor it consistently to make sure it's free from infringement.

The big takeaway here is that it's always a good idea to work with a trademark attorney to protect the intellectual property that you've worked so hard to establish. According to the Wall Street Journal, applicants are approximately 50% more likely to secure their trademark than people who file applications on their own. If your trademark application is rejected by the USPTO, you will need to revise and refile it, incurring additional filing fees. To avoid delays and extra costs, it is best to have a trademark lawyer help you get it right the first time.

Additional Benefits of Using a Trademark Attorney

Great trademark attorneys (like those you'll find at Sausser Summers, PC) will help with every step of filing and enforcing your trademark. Some additional benefits include the following:

Check to see if your proposed trademark is registered by another entity.

Conduct research to see if another business is using the trademark for which you're applying.

Provide advice and guidance on the strength of your trademark.

Draft and submit your trademark applications and application revisions.

Advice and guidance regarding trademark maintenance and protection.

Monitor the market for unauthorized use of your trademark.

Trademark enforcement to protect you against infringement.

 Online Trademark Lawyer Longueuil, Quebec

Curious whether our trademark attorney services are right for you and your business? Contact Sausser Summer, PC, today. Let's talk about what you need, and how we can help.

What About Online Filing Services?

Online services, can provide you with basic assistance in filing your trademark. However, they will never be a legitimate substitute for an experienced trademark attorney helping clients in Longueuil, Quebec.

 Trademark Attorney Longueuil, Quebec

Although online filing services offer a step-by-step process, they take a one-size-fits-all approach to preparing legal documents. Even their advanced service only provides basic attorney assistance in completing your paperwork and helping with minor roadblocks. Online filing services' disclaimer highlights the many limitations of its services, including the fact that communications are not protected by attorney-client privilege. In addition, online filing services cannot provide advice, explanations, opinions, recommendations, or any kind of legal guidance on possible legal rights, remedies, defenses, options, selection of forms or strategies.

In other words, online filing services can offer you the necessary forms and point you in the right direction, but they cannot customize their services to your specific needs or help you with serious complications that may arise.

For the most comprehensive trademark service and protection, it's always wise to work with highly rated trademark lawyers, like you'll find at Sausser Summers, PC.

Understanding Trademarks Over Time

Trademarks in the U.S. can last indefinitely, but did you know that clients in Longueuil, Quebec can file a trademark online, only to lose protection in some circumstances? Trademarks differ from patents and copyrights in that they do not have an expiration date. However, to prevent the cancellation of a trademark, you must maintain it. To ensure that your trademark remains protected, you must actively use it in commerce and renew it with the USPTO every ten years.

The Lanham Act tells us that "use in commerce" is the legitimate use of a trademark in the ordinary course of trade. In other words, you cannot register a trademark solely to reserve the rights to it in the future. In most cases, a trademark must be used continuously in connection with the goods or services it is registered for.

 Trademark Law Firm Longueuil, Quebec

Steps to Renew Your Trademark

Trademarks are registered with the USPTO and generally need to be renewed every ten years. However, there is one crucial exception that you should be aware of. Within the first ten years of owning a trademark, you must file for renewal between the fifth and sixth year from the date of your initial registration.

During this renewal period, you are required to submit a Section 8 declaration, a specimen that shows how the mark is being used, and pay the required fee. You can also apply for Section 15 Incontestability status, which can strengthen your trademark rights. This application, although not mandatory, can make it harder for others to challenge your ownership of the mark.

After the first renewal, which falls between the fifth and sixth year of ownership, the next renewal filing is due between the ninth and tenth year, and then every tenth year thereafter. In the ninth year you will need to file a Section 8 declaration, attesting to your use of the mark or excusable nonuse. You've also got to file a Section 9 renewal application before the end of the tenth year to keep your registration active.

It is worth noting that the USPTO provides a six-month grace period if you fail to renew your mark within the required time frame, but it is best not to rely on it. If you don't file within the grace period time limits, the USPTO will cancel and expire your mark.

By hiring trademark attorneys helping clients in Longueuil, Quebec, you can avoid the pitfalls and mistakes that can arise and cause you to lose your rights to the mark that represents it.

Losing Your Trademark Rights Through Abandonment

In the event that you stop using your trademark and have no plans to resume using it in commerce, it may be considered abandoned by the USPTO. This could result in the loss of your protective rights to the mark. Typically, a trademark is assumed to be abandoned if it has not been used for three years. However, you may be able to refute this presumption by providing evidence that you intend to use the mark again in the future.

Losing Your Trademark Rights Through Inappropriate Licensing

In addition to trademark abandonment, you should also be wary of improper licensing. It's important to remember that once you allow someone else to use your trademark, you must keep an eye on how they use it. You should monitor the products or services that feature your trademark to ensure that they meet consumers' expectations in terms of quality. Failure to do so can lead to a "naked" trademark license and the loss of your protective trademark rights.

How to Avoid Having to Refile Your Trademark

If you're wondering how you can avoid refiling your trademark, the answer is simple: file it correctly the first time around. Filing a trademark isn't inherently difficult, but when doing so, it's very important that certain aspects are filled out accurately in your application. If any information is missing or incorrect, the trademark application may be considered "void ab initio" or void from the beginning, requiring you to file again.

To avoid this, make sure that the information you provide in the application is accurate and complete, including the ownership of the trademark. For instance, if a corporation has multiple shareholders, it should not file under the President's personal name. The rightful owner should be the one/entity that ultimately controls the trademark and the associated goods/services.

It is also important to ensure that the goods and/or services description is precise. For example, if you sell electronic products, you should not file for research and development services despite having a research and development department. The goods/services description should reflect the goods/services you offer to customers, not the departments within your business.

Additionally, providing accurate dates of first use when filing for a trademark is crucial. The USPTO requires two dates to be specified - the date of first use anywhere and the date of first use in interstate commerce. Contact our trademark law office today to learn more about having accurate dates on your filing paperwork.

 Trademark Lawyer Longueuil, Quebec
 Trademark Firm Longueuil, Quebec

What Makes an Online Trademark Attorney Great?

At Sausser Summers, PC, we often get questions about how to distinguish run-of-the-mill consultants and others from great trademark attorneys. After all - when you're looking for an attorney to file or prosecute your business trademark, you should know their qualifications. Here are three ways you can separate the proverbial wheat from the chaff when it comes to trademark attorneys.

It's crucial to seek legal advice from a licensed trademark lawyer rather than relying on advice from non-professionals like trademark consultants. The USPTO even recommends hiring an attorney to help with the trademark process. Although trademark consultants may provide advice on trademark availability or name marketability, they cannot file the trademark for you or offer legal advice. According to the Rules of Practicing in trademark cases, "Individuals who are not attorneys are not recognized to practice before the Office in trademark matters." This rule applies to individuals who assist trademark applicants.

When searching for a trademark attorney, it's important to find someone with a strong background in trademark law. Look for an attorney who specializes in this area and has significant experience handling trademark-related cases. Avoid lawyers who don't have expertise in this field, as they may not be able to provide the guidance and support you need.

Ensure your attorney provides updates throughout the trademark registration process to avoid missing deadlines, including responding to any Office actions within six months. Failure to do so can result in trademark abandonment. The USPTO will only correspond with the listed attorney of record, so make sure your attorney keeps you informed.

In summary:

  • Be sure you're using a licensed trademark attorney helping clients in Longueuil, Quebec.
  • It's best to work with a trademark lawyer who has years of experience filing trademarks.
  • Ensure that your trademark lawyer is willing to provide ongoing notifications relating to your trademark application process.
 Trademark Registration Lawyer Longueuil, Quebec

Trademark Attorneys Working Hard for You

Building your brand and gaining recognition for it is a significant achievement, and it's important to protect it. However, there are certain pitfalls and mistakes that can arise, causing you to lose your rights to the mark that represents it. By working with knowledgeable trademark attorneys, you can avoid these issues and file your trademark successfully.

With an A+ rating from the Better Business Bureau (BBB), Sausser Summers, PC, offers comprehensive guidance, strategic advice, and reliable representation for a variety of trademark matters. Our attorneys have years of real-world experience and, having registered countless trademarks with the USPTO, provide our clients with individualized representation when they need it most.

If you're looking for skilled, adept, and experienced counsel, look no further than our trademark law firm. Contact us today to schedule your initial consultation and learn how we can help you safeguard your brand.

Latest News in Longueuil, Quebec

How citizens’ assemblies worked in one Quebec city

(Version française disponible ici)The turnout rate for municipal elections in Quebec, as in much of ...

(Version française disponible ici)

The turnout rate for municipal elections in Quebec, as in much of Canada, is very low. The most recent round of municipal elections held in 2021 saw turnout of just 39 per cent in the province.

With a minority of eligible citizens voting, it is essential to ask how to make municipal democracy more dynamic and legitimate. To renew democracy, we need to think about electoral reforms and democratic innovations, but political discussions on this subject are often clouded by partisan interests. How can we avoid this trap and ensure that the voices of citizens are heard?

To gain a better understanding of public opinion on democratic reform at the municipal level, we organized a citizens’ assembly in Longueuil in June 2023. The meeting of about 101 participants was held at City Hall, which lent a certain solemnity to the exercise. The participants greatly appreciated the deliberative exercise and were open to proposals for reform.

The event took place over a two-day weekend. This corresponds to the duration of the deliberative assemblies organised in several countries by political scientists James Fishkin and Robert Luskin. It is also the length of time devoted to most subjects by the Irish citizens’ assembly between 2016 and 2018.

The Longueuil assembly focused on four potential reforms: internet voting, compulsory voting, the right to vote for permanent residents (who do not yet have citizenship) and holding municipal elections at the same time as provincial elections. Our decision to cover these four reforms meant that deliberation on each of them was limited to half a day, or just over three hours.

Recruitment proved to be the most difficult aspect of our project. We were asking people to devote an entire weekend to this activity in exchange for financial compensation of $250. We started recruiting by mail, but we had to use social networks to reach our target of around 100 people. The group was finally representative in terms of gender and age, but did not include many people with lower education.

The deliberations took place in four stages for each of the four themes.

First, experts were asked to prepare simple, clear and balanced presentations for each theme. They explained the proposed reform, mentioned where it had been adopted, detailed how it would work in practice and gave the arguments for and against. We then had a question period.

We reminded participants several times that there was no right or wrong answer, that there were good arguments for and against each reform, and that we wanted them to form a personal and informed opinion based on the information provided to them. We asked them to also consider their own values.

Each presentation was followed by a discussion in small groups of around ten participants each, led by a facilitator. We then held a plenary session where participants could ask for further clarification or express their opinions. In the fourth and final stage, participants voted by secret ballot on each of the reforms.

Figure 1 shows the results of the votes. There was clear majority support for internet voting, giving permanent residents the right to vote, and holding municipal and provincial elections at the same time. There was also strong opposition to compulsory voting.

Nearly all participants said they thoroughly enjoyed the experience. Among the 101 respondents who answered the survey that followed the meeting, 75 people said they were “very satisfied” with the overall process, 17 said they were “fairly satisfied” and only two were “not very satisfied”; no one said they were “not at all satisfied.” People listened attentively to the experts’ presentations, asked pertinent questions, exchanged views with their fellow participants, reflected, and finally voted – we have every reason to believe – in a reasoned manner.

Our decision to devote only half a day to each subject obviously limited the deliberations. However, we feel that people had sufficient time to inform themselves and reflect on the specific reforms that were presented to them. It should be stressed that we had chosen simple and precise questions. It would be difficult to apply our approach to highly technical or complex issues.

The main obstacle to recruitment was the considerable time commitment required – a full weekend. This obstacle is inherent in the citizens’ assembly, which requires people to take the time to inform themselves, reflect and exchange views if they want to form an informed opinion. However, we believe that recruitment would have been much easier if the event had only lasted one day.

All in all, we believe that such an exercise in citizen deliberation is highly desirable. Citizen deliberation is a valuable instrument of democracy that should play a greater role in consultation and decision-making processes – particularly when it comes to democratic reforms. Citizens can express themselves at elections, in opinion polls, through petitions and demonstrations.

Why not also invite them to express themselves in a setting where everyone is encouraged to listen to others and to inform themselves about the arguments for and against a policy before taking a position?

The full report can be consulted on the Discutons démocratie à Longueuil website.

Do you have something to say about the article you just read? Be part of the Policy Options discussion, and send in your own submission, or a letter to the editor.

With homelessness on the rise in Quebec, Longueuil now has plan of its own

From improving its housing options to making municipal services universally accessible, the city of Longueuil says it's ready to do more to help people experiencing homelessness.On Monday, Longueuil Mayor Catherine Fournier presented two documents that are supposed to guide the city's efforts to address homelessness: One of them is called the Cadre de référence municipal de lutte à l'itinérance, which outlines the city's broad vision.She also presented Longueuil's action plan for 2024-2026, ...

From improving its housing options to making municipal services universally accessible, the city of Longueuil says it's ready to do more to help people experiencing homelessness.

On Monday, Longueuil Mayor Catherine Fournier presented two documents that are supposed to guide the city's efforts to address homelessness: One of them is called the Cadre de référence municipal de lutte à l'itinérance, which outlines the city's broad vision.

She also presented Longueuil's action plan for 2024-2026, which includes a short-, medium- and long-term to-do list.

"We want to engage with people who are experiencing homelessness in those actions," Fournier said Monday during a news conference. "We want to build a vision that takes care of their needs and to adjust our strategy based on them."

The guiding principles for the city's plan include addressing homelessness in a proactive and preventive way. It also wants to make sure people who are homeless and those who aren't are co-existing. Those principles also include looking at the issue through an intersectional lens, which means a person's gender, ethnic origin, disability are among the things that should be considered when analyzing their situation.

Here are some of the notable parts of Longueuil's action plan for homelessness for 2024-2026:

The city says there are about 15 people living in tents in the city, with most of them being in the Vieux-Longueuil borough.

Fournier said Longueuil does not intend to dismantle any of them, pointing to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and her city's limited resources.

"We think that if we can't house someone who is homeless, we can't dismantle camps," the mayor said.

Dolly Shinhat was present during Monday's news conference.

Her organization, Our Harbour, is a non-profit group in the city of Saint-Lambert on Montreal's South Shore that provides long-term housing to people with mental illnesses.

Shinhat welcomes Longueuil's long list of initiatives but says the city should always keep its focus on the main goal, which is to find permanent housing solutions.

She said her organization rents apartment units and doing so — as opposed to buying property and being responsible for renovations and maintenance — could be an effective way for Longueuil to help people in need.

"When you rent an apartment, you're just responsible for that small [unit]. It's a more sustainable way, I would say, of addressing this crisis," Shinhat said.

Homelessness data for Longueuil

Last fall, the Quebec government published its second provincewide survey on homelessness, which provided a picture of the situation as of October 2022.

At that time, the number of people experiencing homelessness in Quebec had doubled since 2018.

Out of a total about 10,000 people, 4,690 of them lived in Montreal. The number for the Montérégie region was 798, though Longueuil's mayor said she has stressed to the province the need to have numbers specifically for her city.

On Monday, she said the city believes the large majority of the 798 people mentioned in the survey were in Longueuil.

The city estimates that there are now between 200 and 1,000 people in Longueuil experiencing homelessness.

The action plan is expected to cost the city $825,000 in 2024. The mayor said the cost is expected to go up in 2025 and 2026.

The fight against homelessness is mainly the province's responsibility and Fournier said she wants to talk with the Quebec government about the needs in her city.

To learn more about the city's vision and its action plan, you can click here and here.

Longueuil can proceed with deer cull in park, Court of Appeal rules

Article contentThe city of Longueuil will be able to allow controlled crossbow hunting in order to counter the overpopulation of deer in Michel-Chartrand Park, as ...

Article content

The city of Longueuil will be able to allow controlled crossbow hunting in order to counter the overpopulation of deer in Michel-Chartrand Park, as initially decided by the Superior Court on Aug. 31.

Court of Appeal Judge Robert Mainville rejected the request of the organization Sauvetage Animal Rescue and plaintiff Florence Meney, with the support of the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA), who wanted to block the decision of Quebec’s forests, wildlife and parks department to grant the city authorization to kill deer.

Article content

The herd exceeds 100 animals, while experts estimate the capacity of the park at around 20.

The appeal essentially revolved around the interpretation of Article 898.1 of the Civil Code of Quebec, which emphasizes that “animals are not things” and “they are sentient beings and have biological needs.”

In his judgment, the judge wrote that the applicants argued that Article 898.1 “would require government authorities to only consider slaughter in cases of animal nuisance after having excluded all other solutions, such as sterilization or relocation.”

But according to the judgment, Longueuil offered several opportunities to the applicants to express their point of view “on the question of the measures to be taken in order to resolve the problem of overpopulation of deer within the park” and that the decision to slaughter animals “is part of the legitimate exercise of the powers that the law attributes to the city in matters of parks, the environment, nuisances, health and safety.”

The plaintiffs, according to Judge Mainville, “have not succeeded in demonstrating the unreasonable nature” of the municipal administration’s decision and this decision is “the result of a long process of consultation and reflection that integrates important considerations for the well-being and sensitivity of deer.

A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.

The next issue of Today's One Read will soon be in your inbox.

We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again

Article content

The judgment also emphasizes that the ministry ensures that the permit to kill deer includes “all the conditions allowing the operation to be carried out while respecting animal sensitivity.”

In a statement sent to the media, Longueuil Mayor Catherine Fournier welcomed the decision.

“Now that the Court of Appeal has confirmed the absence of grounds for appeal of the decision of the Superior Court of Quebec rendered on Aug. 31, and in accordance with our expectations, our teams will continue the work to complete the livestock reduction operation and thus restore the ecological balance of Michel-Chartrand Park, as we quickly undertook in the weeks following our taking office at city hall, in the fall of 2021.”

The municipal councillor of the sector, Jonathan Tabarah, added that the decision “reassures the population” while “the state of Michel-Chartrand Park continues to deteriorate rapidly due to the overpopulation of deer, which worries citizens, in addition to the road safety issues inherent to the surroundings of the park.”

The mayor’s office indicated that the timetable and the intervention plan for killing the park’s animals will be communicated to the population soon.

This saga began in 2020 when the city, wanting to control the deer population, estimated that it had to capture and euthanize around 15 animals.

The decision aroused strong opposition from some residents and animal rights groups, dragging it out long enough for the white-tailed deer population to explode and exceed 100.


This website publishes news articles that contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. The non-commercial use of these news articles for the purposes of local news reporting constitutes "Fair Use" of the copyrighted materials as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law.